Kevin Pietersen
has been added to England's squad for the forthcoming Test series in
India, so bringing to an end one of the most extraordinary stand-offs in
the history of the game between a star player and those appointed to
rule.
It has taken 73 days for England and Pietersen to patch up their
differences since he followed up what should have been one of the most
triumphant moments of his career - a stirring century
in the Headingley Test against South Africa - by talking of deep and
perhaps irreparable divisions with the ECB and some members of the
England dressing room.
Once the parties began to talk, the "reintegration process" of Pietersen
into the England side took only a couple of days. It just took them an
extremely long time to talk.
Pietersen flew back to England from the Champions League in South Africa
this week for a series of meetings in Oxford and London with Andy
Flower, England's director of cricket, the captain Alastair Cook and key
England players with whom his relationship had become increasingly
fractious. Even a delayed flight could not prevent the speedy patching
up of their differences.
Confirmation that the Cold War was coming to an end came in Colombo a
fortnight ago when Giles Clarke, the chairman of the ECB, flanked by a
nervous Pietersen, pronounced that it was time for "forgiveness" and a reintegration into "our society."
Hugh Morris, England cricket's managing director, made what followed all
sound eminently straightforward, saying: "We were keen that Kevin
should hold a series of face-to-face meetings with team management and
senior players before the Test squad departs for the UAE and India next
week.
"The meetings were constructive and cordial and all outstanding issues
have been resolved. All the England players and management are now keen
to draw a line under this matter and fully focus on the cricketing
challenge that lies ahead in India.
In their desire to impress upon Pietersen that no player, however
talented, was greater than the team, England lacked their most
destructive batsman and arguably failed to qualify for the World
Twenty20 semi-finals in Sri Lanka while he was employed instead as a
pundit in a Colombo TV studio.
Considering the political machinations that have gone on behind the
scenes, the announcement by Geoff Miller, the chief selector, of
Pietersen's return to England's fold could not have sounded more
deadpan.
"We are pleased to welcome a player of Kevin's proven international
calibre back into the Test squad for such an important Test series," his
statement read. "As we anticipate that Ian Bell will return home for
the birth of his first child around the time of the second Test in
Mumbai, the team will benefit from having an extra batsman in the squad
and all players who were originally selected for the tour will fly out
as planned next week."
Pietersen has been given licence to fulfil his Champions League
commitments with Delhi Daredevils before joining up with the squad.
Pietersen returns then, but he returns on very different terms. It could
not have been made more apparent that Flower, as England's director of
cricket, must be entirely respected, whether in judging how hard he
trains or what training top he should wear to do it.
Flower, who had seen the last England coach, Peter Moores, lose his job
after Pietersen, as captain, encouraged and then led a rebellion, will
now expect unerring loyalty.
The England hierarchy is convinced that their uncompromising stance has
brought Pietersen to heel and that their assertion that the team ethic
is more important than any glorious individual achievement has been
pronounced from the rooftops. Pietersen now has what England see as a
final chance to harness his abilities to the demands of the team.
Clarke, in his announcement in Colombo, made it sound as if Pietersen
had been released from imprisonment. In that case, we can presume that,
in England's mind, he is still tagged, his every move watched for
evidence of regression.
Pietersen is back, but who knows for how long? Relationships with
several England players remain frosty, particularly with the
Nottinghamshire pair of Graeme Swann and Stuart Broad, who captained
England in the Twenty20 World Cup in Sri Lanka.
He has played his most exceptional innings when he has felt the
adulation of the crowd and acceptance of his fellows. He must now
perform for England in India in an atmosphere, irrespective of the
"success" of the integration process, which will not be healed
overnight.
It remains to be seen whether he will find inspiration from that or
whether England, in taming their most unpredictable talent, may also
have damaged him beyond measure.
0 comments:
Post a Comment